Friday, January 6, 2012

Batu Kawan Berhad vs. Kuala Lumpur Kepong Berhad

The author published the analysis report here is for his own reference only. It is not an indication of the author's business interests for companies being analyzed. It is definitely not an investment advice, please see the full disclaimer located at the bottom of the blog post.

Batu Kawan Berhad's (hereafter called "BKAWAN") principal activities including investment holdings, oil palm plantation, chemicals manufacturing, money lending, general transportation services, letting of storage warehouse facilities, manufacture and sale of methyl chloride and manufacture of sulphuric acid products. Kuala Lumpur Kepong Berhad's (hereafter called "KLK") principal activities including the business of plantation, producing and processing palm products and natural rubber on its plantations, manufacturing, retailing, property development and investment holding. BKAWAN is major shareholder of KLK, holding 46.57% equity interests at financial ended 31 September 2011.

Side-by-side Comparison
Capitalization
Measure by size, KLK was a lot bigger than BKAWAN, almost 4 times the size of BKAWAN.

Income Items
Important items under this section is per share earnings and dividend, BKAWAN is all time winner in per share earnings and dividend.

Balance Sheet Items

Both BKAWAN and KLK have very solid balance sheet, their Current assets is more than enough cover their Total liabilities. But BKAWAN is better, as it's Cash or cash equivalents is more than enough cover the Current liabilities and close to cover the Total liabilities

Ratios
Price-wise, BKAWAN is much more attractive at the moment given it sell at much lower multiple of earnings currently compared to KLK. The Net income/sales of BKAWAN is meaningless here given over 90% of it's profit before tax was contributed by it's key associate, KLK.

Earning growth rate in both companies in near-term and long-term are very much parallel due to the reason mentioned in previous sentence. These numbers is not applicable to MSC as it experienced significant loss in 2010.

Price Record
BKAWAN has much higher price growth rate in the near-term where KLK has higher price growth rate in the long-term.

Financial Summary
As over 90% pre-tax profit of BKAWAN was contributed by KLK, the title of this post is more appropriate to named as "Batu Kawan Berhad and Kuala Lumpur Kepong Berhad" instead of "Batu Kawan Berhad vs. Kuala Lumpur Kepong Berhad". When you invest into BKAWAN, you are largely invest into KLK. Let's look into financial summary of both companies as usual.

BKAWAN's Financial Summary
By looking into detail of the financial summary of BKAWAN, it doesn't grow it's sales much and grow it's operating income moderately in 2007 to 2011, performance of these two items is bumpy. Fortunately, BKAWAN still managed to achieve favorable average operating profit margin as recorded by Operating Income/Sales, 25.34%. It was great that BKAWAN involved in stock re-purchasing program which reduce it's outstanding shares, -0.9% every year.

KLK's Financial Summary
KLK has high historical growth record in the past 5 years, recorded Compounded Annual Growth Rate (hereafter called "CAGR") for 20.67% in sales, 24.1% in operating income, 22.66% in net income and earning per share and comparable moderate growth in total liabilities, 16.41%. All numbers are great except numbers of 2009. KLK doing well in return on average equity (ROAE), return on average asset (ROAA) and profit margin, all numbers achieved double digits in percentage terms except year 2009.

Given today's closing price of both BKAWAN and KLK, the market capitalization of BKAWAN is 7,725 millions and KLK is 26,240 millions, 46.57% of KLK is currently valued at 12,220 millions. By invest into BKAWAN with today quotation, you are taking 36.78% discount to invest into KLK indirectly.  

As conclusion, BKAWAN is the winner of this comparison due to it's lower valuation and favorable reason above.

How Much BKAWAN Worth?
Given the company CAGR of EPS is 18% (approximately 22.3% in the past 5 years) and Dividend Per Share is 15% in the next 10 years, the EPS of the company will be RM$2.44 in 2021 (included adjustment of 2 bad years in 10 which reduce 50% of group's net profit) and the forecast dividends received over the 10 years period totaling RM$9.11 (included adjustment of 2 bad years).

If the stock price of BKAWAN sell at 10 times earning in 2021, it is RM$24.40 and included total dividends received, it is RM$33.52 per share. Given annual 6% inflation rate in next 10 years, the discounted rate is 0.591898. So, RM$33.52 discounted to today price, it is RM$19.84 per share.

The discounted price is 6.85% lower comparing to today (06 January 2012) closing price RM$18.48. In my opinion, the stock is only discounted in narrow margin, what do you think?

Tuesday, January 3, 2012

2011 Portfolio Review

As I established Investment Yardstick for US and Hong Kong Market in June 2011, it is time for annual review.

Portfolio Summary
Cost is based on market open price on 1 June 2011. Gain/(Loss) calculation with dividends included.
It is 7 months review instead of full year annual review. From the table above, it is clear that none of the portfolio is doing well, all turn red except Fortune 10. My US Portfolio is beat by both Dow Jone 15 and Fortune 10, -2.82% and -5.08% respectively. My HK Portfolio is beat by both Hang Seng HK 15 and Hang Seng Mainland 12, -3.81% and -4.81% respectively. In conclusion, my investment performance in these 7 months cannot match with these index funds. Please see tables below for detail of each index fund.

US Market
Dow Jones 15
Fortune 10

Hong Kong Market
Hang Seng HK 15
Hang Seng Mainland 12

Disclaimer

The author writing this blog is for personal records and information sharing purpose only, it is not professional investment advices. The author specifically disclaim any implied warranties of merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose. Neither the author shall be liable for any loss of profit or any commercial damages, including but not limited to special, incidental, consequential, or other damages.